The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence of the court below against the defendant in the summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable.

2. Although part of the circumstances favorable to the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant recognized the crime and reflects on the fact that the defendant committed the crime, and the equality with the case that was punished together with the crime that became final and conclusive in the judgment of the court below, are recognized. However, since the defendant used the credit card from the victim who was the offender to use the credit card without any particular crime and received the loan to the victim's name, the victim suffered suffering since the damage has not been restored until four years have passed since the crime was committed, the defendant had the record of being sentenced twice a fine for the same criminal offense, and other circumstances that form the conditions for the sentencing specified in this case, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, family relationship, and circumstances after the crime, the court below's punishment is too unreasonable, the defendant and his defense counsel's allegation of unfair sentencing is not justified.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.