The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence of the lower court against the accused (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Although the circumstances favorable to the defendant are partially recognized, such as the fact that the defendant recognized the crime and reflects on the fact that the defendant committed the crime, that is the first offender who has no means of punishment, support the wife and her children, etc., the above favorable circumstances appear to have been reflected in the court below, and the above favorable circumstances have not yet been restored until four years have passed since the date of the crime in this case, and other various circumstances, including the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, family relationship, circumstances after the crime, etc., are considered as conditions for the sentencing in this case, the court below's punishment is too unreasonable. Thus, the defendant and her attorney's allegation of unfair sentencing is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.