The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant added to illegal demonstration and riot developed from May 14, 1980. From around 13:00 to around 17:00 of May 21, 1980, the Defendant carried out relief activities, such as “emergency martial law decrison”, “Crara,” and “Crara,” while carrying 30 or more widths around the entrance of Gwangju City on board a bus at the seat of Gwangju City, and returned to the members of the Do in Gwangju City. From around 11:0 of May 22, 1980 to around 15:00 of the same month, the Defendant carried out activities with 20 buses around 11:0 of Do administration with the width of 20 buses from around 11:0 of Do administration to around 15:00 of the same month, and carried the firearms at the same time without the permission of the Do governor from around 10 to 20:500 Do administration and without going to 15:500 Do administration.

2. The judgment of E, etc. does not constitute a justifiable act for the purpose of protecting the existence of the Constitution and constitutional order (see, e.g., Supreme Court en banc Decision 96Do376, Apr. 17, 1997; Supreme Court Decision 96Do376, Apr. 17, 1981; Supreme Court Decision 200Do4158, Apr. 17, 200). Whether a certain act constitutes a crime of destruction of constitutional order as a crime of insurrection; and “an act related to the May 18 Democratization” or “an act of preventing or opposing a crime of destruction of constitutional order that occurred before or after December 12, 197 and May 18, 1980, etc.” does not constitute a crime of destruction of constitutional order (see, e.g., Supreme Court en banc Decision 200Do3776, Apr. 17, 1997).