logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2019.10.23 2019고단3222
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 14:50 on July 17, 2019, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.275%, driven a D Eccoo motor vehicle in front of the “C” restaurant “C” restaurant “C” in Sinsi-si B, Sinsi-si, I turned it to E by driving the D Ccoo motor vehicle from the flood of the Scoo distance.

At the same time, there is no median line, and there was a vehicle to make a left turn or a right turn in the opposite side, so in such a case, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by properly manipulating the brake system by properly manipulating the front side and the right and the right of the driver of the vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and neglected to drive normally under the influence of alcohol, such as influorous distance, while she was unable to drive normally under the influence of alcohol, and due to occupational negligence, which was caused by failure to properly operate the brake system, and received the part front of the driver’s seat of the G Ra car in front of the driver’s seat of the Defendant’s vehicle in front of the Defendant’s vehicle driving seat in the direction opposite to the Defendant’s proceeding.

As a result, the Defendant driven the said car in a state where it is difficult to drive the car normally due to the influence of drinking, and suffered injury such as salt, tension, etc. in need of treatment for about two weeks.

2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (unnecessary Measures after Accidents) at the time and place specified in Paragraph 1 as above, and left the scene without taking necessary measures after the accident, such as immediately lowering the rash and providing personal information, etc. so that the rash driver’s above rash car was received from the Defendant’s driver as above by the Defendant’s above nash driver’s vehicle, and the 720,438 won repair cost.

3. The Defendant who violated the Road Traffic Act (driving) shall be H. on July 17, 2019 at the time of entertainment around 14:50.

arrow