Defendant

The appeal is dismissed.

1. A summary of the grounds for appeal (a factual error) did not state that, around August 29, 2013, the Defendant only consulted with the victim in the street street in front of the E-cafeteria in Daejeon-gu Daejeon-gu, and that, “packer is a non-satch...... labor cost is also removed and eating a half day,” and even if the Defendant said speech, the Defendant made such a speech.

Even if there was no other person than the victim at the time, the defendant's speech did not have a public performance.

2. The judgment of the court below is consistent with the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, i.e., ① the victim made a statement from the investigative agency to the court of the court of the court that “the defendant made the same remarks as the facts charged on the part of the defendant F, at a place less than 4-5 meters away from the 4-5 meters away from the facts charged,” and F also made a statement that “the defendant made the victim a statement the same as the facts charged on the part of the victim in his and her own, on the part of 3 children,” and ② the defendant made a false statement on October 15, 2013 on the part of the victim, and delivered it to the victim. Even if the victim made the draft of the criminal charge as the defendant’s defense counsel, considering the following circumstances, it is recognized that the defendant made it difficult to believe that the date, place, and statement made a false statement to recover the relationship with the victim and delivered it to the victim.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.