Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A and victims C and D are merchants of the E market in the original state.

A. On September 30, 2016, at around 16:30, 201, Defendant A: (a) had approximately 15 members, including Victim C, and executive officers, etc., within the office of the Magdong-si E-si; (b) although the victim did not remove and eating management expenses on the E market, Defendant A called “the victim would be removed and eating management expenses,” and “the victim would be responsible for the horse of the Defendant; and (c) the victim was removed from the management expenses for the E market.”

그래서 회원들이 너 물어내라 그랬잖아

As a sound attack, "the reputation of the victim was damaged by openly pointing out false facts."

B. On October 14, 2016, Defendant A demanded the victim’s statement that the victim D embezzled the instant management expenses to an officer of the board of directors at the place where 15 members of the E market conference and the board of directors, such as the members of the E market conference and the executives of the board of directors, etc. within the office of the E market conference in the city of the original city, the victim made a demand to explain the Defendant’s statement that he embezzled the instant management expenses to an officer of the board of directors at this general meeting, and the victim publicly insulting the victim by stating the “

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each legal statement of witness D, F and G;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each letter of complaint and recording;

1. Relevant Article 307(2) of the Criminal Act, Articles 307(2) and 311 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines for a crime;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;

1. Article 186(1) main text of the Criminal Procedure Act (the Defendant and his defense counsel stated that the Defendant and his defense counsel’s insult against the victim D is a mixed standard at the time, time, and place indicated in the judgment, and there was no humbling as indicated in the judgment in the victim D.

However, each of the witnesses D, F, and G.