beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. The case concerning victim D;
A. A. Around November 19, 2012, the Defendant committed the crime on or around November 19, 2012, the Defendant obtained permission to use two stores located in the E Park, and the monthly sales of the stores in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government are below KRW 10 million, and the sublease or transfer of the above stores was prohibited, and even if the Defendant already received money from the victim D, he did not have an intention or ability to return the above money if he did not transfer or transfer the right to operate the said stores. However, the Defendant obtained permission to use two stores located in the E Park, with the Defendant’s daily sales of KRW 4 million to KRW 4 million to KRW 5 million to another person, and the monthly sales of the above stores are close to 68 million to KRW 68 million to be paid at the time, and 00 million to the effect that the Defendant obtained the right to acquire the above money from the victim D and obtained the right to acquire the money from the victim.
B. On November 20, 2012, the Defendant committed the crime at a non-permanent place around November 20, 2012, and the fact was prohibited from sub-lease or transfer of the above store, and was also liable for a large amount of debt, and even if the Defendant borrowed money from the victim, he did not have the intent or ability to pay the money properly, he/she shall lend KRW 33,00,000 to the victim and arrange the store and repay all the money already received within the day.
On November 21, 2011, the Defendant received KRW 33,000,000 from the victim, including KRW 30,000,000 on the same day, and KRW 30,000 on November 22, 201. (c) On November 22, 2012, the Defendant committed the crime, the Defendant received money from the victim, and received money from the victim, and received money from the victim and did not think that it was used for the operation of the restaurant. However, the Defendant was in negligence.