1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for modification, modification, or addition as follows, among the reasons of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it shall be cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act

2. Parts to be modified, corrected, or added;

A. A. A. B. Of the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance, 1. A. B. “B” is amended to “B.”

B. Of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, “256,127,90 won for the Plaintiff” in the third part of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be changed to “256,127,990 won for the Plaintiff, including 255,964,940 won for subrogation and penalty of 163,050 won for the said subrogation and penalty of 163,050 won for the Plaintiff.”

C. The reasoning of the judgment of the first instance court is as follows at the end of the “Plaintiff’s assertion” in paragraph (a) of 2.

The Defendant is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff the sum of KRW 255,964,940, penalty of KRW 163,050, and the remaining substitute payment of KRW 3,066,771, as well as damages for delay of KRW 255,964,94,940 among them.

Of the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance court, “the Ministry of Employment and Labor” was added to “corporate bank” in the second sentence among the grounds of the judgment of the second instance, and “the fact that there is the director in charge” in the second sentence, and “the fact that there is the director in charge,” and “the fact that C and H two persons are registered from February 1, 201 to March 31, 201,” added to “the fact that there is an additional property,” or reduced to “the following fact that it is difficult to decrease as the Defendant’s property,” in the list of acquisition of employment insurance qualifications for the Defendant’s workplace from November 1, 2010 to May 10, 201, from July 31, 2011 to January 31, 2012, from February 1 to March 9, 2012.”

3. The plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance is just and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.