logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2016.06.10 2015나5240
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for modification, modification, deletion, or addition as follows. Thus, it shall be cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Parts to be modified, corrected, deleted, or added;

A. 2. D of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be amended as follows:

Plaintiff

In September 18, 2002, the Z trade union was established in the company, and the representative of the above trade union was V, the relative representative of U representative director of the plaintiff.

B. Of the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance court, each of the “Plaintiff’s trade union” in paragraph (2) is amended to each “Z trade union”.

C. Of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, the term “B 9-1 and 9-2” in the second sentence of 4.b. 2 is modified to “B 9-1 and 9-2” and the term “Defendant I deletes the head of the division in Article 20-2” in the same sentence below. D. Of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, 4.b. 2) last part of “I do not affect the above conclusion even if the Plaintiff’s testimony and Eul’s testimony of the witness in the first instance court emphasized at the trial is considered in the evidence No. 9.”

3. The plaintiff's claim against the defendants is dismissed as it is without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance is just and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow