logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2018. 02. 28. 선고 2017두68981 판결
(심리불속행)[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court-2017-Nu-54236 ( October 27, 2017)

Title

(Resceptic Conduct)

Summary

The amount of outflow from the company shall be disposed of as a bonus for the representative in cases where the ownership is unclear. In cases where the damage claim is waived by the corporation, it shall be deemed the outflow from

Related statutes

Article 106 (1) 2 of the Enforcement Decree of the former Corporate Tax Act

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but it is clear that the assertion on the grounds of appeal by the appellant falls under Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal and therefore, the appeal is dismissed under Article 5 of the Act. It is so decided as per Disposition

arrow