The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (one and half years of imprisonment and three years of suspended execution) is too unreasonable.

2. The crime of this case was committed with 635 points that the defendant had been under custody of the safe bank of the office located in D and the court room, and was concealed in nearby wild greenhouses. The crime of this case is very poor in its nature. The vinyl, which the defendant concealed the above cultural properties, is easy to access by the outside person. On the left side, it seems that there was a valley and a valley on the right side, so that there was a very high risk of damage due to natural disasters. The cultural properties themselves are worth preserving and are very difficult to restore as they are themselves worth preserving, but they were concealed at a place where there was little historical value, and that the defendant was subject to criminal punishment due to the violation of the Preservation and Support of Traditional Temples Act.

On the other hand, the circumstances favorable to the defendant are that the defendant recognized the crime of this case and reflects his mistake, that the cultural heritage concealed by the defendant was fully recovered, and substantial part of the cultural heritage was voluntarily submitted by the defendant, and that there was no record of punishment exceeding the fine.

위와 같은 사정들과 그 밖에 피고인의 나이, 성 행, 환경, 범행의 동기, 수단과 결과, 범행 후의 정황 등 변론에 나타난 모든 양형조건 및 대법원 양형 위원회 제정 양형기준의 권고 형량 범위 ◈ 법률상 처단형의 범위: 징역 1년 ~ 15년 ◈ 양형기준에 따른 권고 형의 범위 [ 유형의 결정] 손괴 > 일반적 기준 > 제 3 유형( 지정 문화재 손상 등) [ 특별 양형 인자] 없음 [ 권고 영역 및 권고 형의 범위] 기본영역, 징역 1년 6월 ~ 3년 , 제 1 심과 비교하여 양형의 조건에 변화가 없고 제 1 심의 양형이...