A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant has served as a widely known person of "D" from March 13, 2008 to March 12, 2013.

While any person does not harm, steals, conceal, or otherwise impair the utility of any designated cultural heritage or general movable property by any other means, the Defendant: (a) around 10:00 on May 9, 2016, the Defendant: (b) placed 3 points in the list of crimes in the attached Form No. 1, which was kept in the City/Do, and the City/Do designated cultural property under the custody of the City/Do Party; (c) contained 635 points in the list of crimes in the attached Form No. 3 (T) and the F in the era of consideration, which is a general movable culture, in a paper box; and (d) concealed it in a nearby camping greenhouse located within a distance of about 300 meters from the said inspection.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. Photographs photographs, such as a report on theft of cultural heritage, a written confirmation of each fact (the list Nos. 4 and 5), a statement of history of recovery, photographs at the scene of theft, relevant photographs, photographs at the time of appraisal, and places of

1. Each investigation report (the head of a harbor site and the recovery thereof, and the verification of the type of cultural heritage designated as a failure to send D gold paper);

1. Each list of seizure and each protocol of seizure (a list of evidence Nos. 23, 24, 25, 26, 28);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on appraisal protocol;

1. Article 92 (2), 1, and 2 of the Protection of Cultural Heritage Act (including Article 92 (2), 1, and 2) of the relevant Act on criminal facts;

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (Article 55 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing)

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the following grounds for sentencing has been repeated for a favorable reason):

1. The scope of applicable sentences by law: Imprisonment for one year to 15 years; and

2. The scope of the recommended punishment according to the sentencing guidelines [the scope of the recommended punishment [the types] [the general standards for the crime of destruction and damage to the designated cultural properties] that there exist no three types (the determination of the recommended area and the scope of the recommended punishment] [the scope of the recommended area], the basic area of the recommended punishment, one year and six months to three years.

3. The criminal act of this case, which was committed by the defendant in custody of the court room in D and the designated cultural properties in the court room, and the ordinary movable properties in the country room, are concealed in the mountain greenhouse near the 635th place.