logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2014.01.22 2013고정2288
무고등
Text

A fine of three million won shall be imposed on a defendant.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around June 2008, the Defendant: (a) made a written complaint stating that “B, on May 15, 2013, borrowed a halog car to the Defendant for the purpose of having B receive criminal punishment; (b) made a written complaint stating that “B, on June 20, 2008, borrowed a halog car to the Defendant for the use of a computer from the TWlog-type reproduction house, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju, for the purpose of having B receive criminal punishment; and (c) submitted the written complaint to the civil service office of the Gwangju District Public Prosecutor’s Office, stating that “B, on June 20, 2008, borrowed the halog-type car from the Defendant for the use of the computer, and then arbitrarily sold it to D, thereby acquiring the above vehicle amounting to seven million won in market price.”

2. On June 2013, the Defendant without authority, without the authority to exercise in Gwangju for the purpose of uttering in Gwangju, stated that “The fact confirmation, name E, and the E’s seal which is arbitrarily rejected on the name of E and without the authority of the Defendant, was found to have sold the vehicle to another person, and the Defendant sold the vehicle thereafter. There was a fact that the Defendant sold the vehicle to another person, and the copy changed the letter of accusation to the F judicial scrivener, and there was a fact that the F of the Defendant’s pro-Japanese job F of the defect was known to the Defendant, and there was a fact that the Defendant’s address F of the defect was knee and keled for three hours at the Defendant’s bar, and then forged one copy of the fact in the name of E of the private document related to the certificate of fact-finding.

3. On June 17, 2013, the Defendant, at the Gwangju Mine Police Station, exercised a forged confirmation document to G, as described in paragraph 2, as if the document was duly formed, along with the E’s resident registration certificate.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The suspect interrogation protocol of the police as to B;

1. E statements;

1. A report on investigation (26 pages of investigation records);

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for the crime;

arrow