logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2018.01.11 2015가단77780
손해배상(기)
Text

1. Defendant B and D jointly share KRW 19,609,000 to the Plaintiff, and Defendant B with respect thereto from January 5, 2016 to January 11, 2018.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is the owner of E 2.2 tons of the so-called “the so-called the so-called “the so-called the so-called the so-called “the so-called the so-called “the so-called the so-called the instant so-called the Defendant D is a person who drives the F Kacles (hereinafter referred to as the

B. Defendant B received orders for the removal of interior interior interior interior interior interior interior interior of G building (hereinafter “the removal of this case”) and requested the Plaintiff to remove the removal using the excavation equipment of this case. Defendant D requested Defendant D to move the instant removal equipment between floors at the site of the removal work.

C. Around September 17, 2015, Defendant D driven the instant carnet and moved from the second floor to the third floor, and a slot link (the connecting line) connected to the instant carnet to the outside due to an internal obstacle of the third floor, which was cut into the sloping beam of the instant building and fell down (hereinafter “instant accident”). D.

Before the instant accident, the Plaintiff demanded Defendant D to connect 2 slots by taking into account the weight of the digging machines, but Defendant D had the instant accident occurred while moving the digging machines using the instant carcles by connecting only one slots with only one.

[Ground of recognition] A without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4 (including each number if there is a provisional number; hereinafter the same shall apply), Eul evidence Nos. 1, the party's personal examination result of defendant B, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. Whether Defendant D’s liability for damages against the Defendants was established or not, when intending to move the instant searcher by driving the instant Kacke, Defendant D had several solid slots connected to each other so that the weight of the instant searcher can be tanked, and that it should be operated safely by checking the surrounding circumstances well, but only one slot machine connected with the Defendants, and slves into the slve beam of the building iron system and cut off.

arrow