1. The Defendant’s KRW 21,209,50 for the Plaintiff and 6% per annum from May 12, 2014 to December 8, 2016.

1. The Defendant, from January 2012, imported and sold health-aid foods through the Plaintiff. To clarify the relationship between the Plaintiff and the Defendant, the following transaction agreements (hereinafter “instant agreement”) were concluded on April 23, 2012.

Article 3 (Goods and Unit Price) A (referring to the plaintiff) of the Agreement on Trade shall be supplied to B (the defendant) as follows, and goods may be added by mutual agreement:

Alleys: 3,500 Cheongri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-si (2 bottle 1: 23,000 Cheongri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri (2 bottle 1: 13,000 A-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri (2 1: 13,500 bit)-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-go (1)-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri

§ 7(3) A may not supply to a third party a product to which the exclusive right is given without the consent of B, and if A gives it to a third party and there is clear evidence, A shall compensate B for 10 million won per installment.

The Defendant supplied goods to the Plaintiff in accordance with the instant agreement.

The Plaintiff and the Defendant decided to terminate the transaction on January 2013, and accordingly, the Defendant repaid part of the price of the goods to the Plaintiff from February 2013 to May 2014.

The Plaintiff sent text messages to the Defendant that much of the outstanding amount would remain at each time for receiving the product price from the Defendant. On May 12, 2014, the Plaintiff received 3 million won from the Defendant even on May 14, 2014, and then received the Defendant’s attempted amount of KRW 22,201,50.

The defendant sent a text message to the effect that it is "," but the defendant did not answer the plaintiff's text message.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1-8 evidence, and the purport of the whole pleadings.