The defendant shall be innocent.

1. On April 19, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for a violation of the Subsidy Management Act at the Daejeon District Court on the grounds of a violation of the Subsidy Management Act, and the judgment became final and conclusive on November 8, 2017.

A. On October 2014, the Defendant committed the crime at around October 2014, at the office located under the “C Regional Child Center” located in Daejeon Jung-gu, Daejeon on October 13, 2014, to the victim D’s “a plan to operate a medical care center in the E hotel,” and the cost of financing KRW 22 million is required to be loaned to the victim D.

“Falsely false.”

However, the Defendant had no capacity to take over the hotel E, and even if receiving KRW 22 million, he/she had the intent to use it as the expense of the social welfare foundation F, which is the representative director, rather than the acquisition expense, and even if he/she borrowed KRW 22 million in excess of the personal debt at the time, he/she did not have the intent or ability to complete the repayment until the due date.

Nevertheless, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim as above; (b) transferred KRW 20 million from the victim to the Defendant Agricultural Cooperative Account (G) around October 13, 2014; and (c) wired KRW 2 million by the same method as around the 24th day of the same month.

2) The primary charges charged against the Defendant around November 2014 are as follows: (a) at the house of the Defendant located in the Chungcheong-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun on November 9, 2014; and (b) at the victim D, the amount of money that the Defendant failed to construct the facilities for the protection of sexual assault victims exceeds KRW 150 million.

By the end of January 2015, the Do and Jeju will pay the debt by the end of January 2015.

“A false statement” was made.

In fact, even if personal debts at the time of maturity exceed KRW 150 million due to a large amount of debts, there was no intention or ability to repay them by the date of maturity.

Nevertheless, on November 12, 2014, the Defendant received 70 million won from the injured party to the Agricultural Cooperative Account (I) in the name of a social welfare foundation H as a loan loan, and received 30 million won from the same account on the 13th day of the same month, and 5.0 million won from the same account on the 14th day of the same month.