Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 27, 2015, the Defendant, on August 27, 2015, calls from the victim D at around 104 Dongsan-si, Asan-si, about August 27, 2015 and calls from the victim D.

The purpose of this paper was to "be used only one month and to lend money."

However, at the time, the Defendant was in excess of his/her obligation, such as that he/she cannot pay interest, living expenses, etc. on the existing obligation, and even if he/she borrowed money from the injured party, he/she did not have an intention or ability to pay the money properly

Therefore, the Defendant received money from the injured party to his own new bank account from the injured party and acquired it by remittance of KRW 10 million on the same day.

2. On September 8, 2015, the accused of fraud calls to the victim at a place where the location of the warning is unknown on September 8, 2015, and “the date of dishonor” is the same.

The purpose was to say that it would be a loan of KRW 5 million, and that it would be a loan of money.

However, at the time, the Defendant was in excess of his/her obligation, such as interest on the existing obligation, living expenses, etc., and even if he/she sold his/her house, he/she did not have the intent or ability to pay the money first to the victim because there are many other obligations.

Therefore, the defendant received money from the injured party to his own new bank account from the injured party and acquired it by remittance of KRW 5 million on the same day.

3. On October 26, 2015, the defrauded Defendant called the victim at a place where it is impossible to know the place of light or around October 26, 2015 and lent KRW 7 million to the victim “ soon as it is necessary to pay the money.” Since the house has not yet been sold, the Defendant would repay all the money borrowed from the house.

“.” The purport was “.

However, at the time, the Defendant was in excess of his/her obligation, such as interest on the existing obligation, living expenses, etc., and even if he/she sold his/her house, he/she did not have the intent or ability to pay the money first to the victim because there are many other obligations.

Thus, the defendant is the defendant.