The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant has the victim B (the victim 47 years old, South) who is an acting driver, drive his/her own vehicle on behalf of others.

The Defendant, around 00:20 on October 7, 2015, is expected to return to the original location of the victim, on the ground that the victim, who was a substitute driver at Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government and the front street, was at a time of a trial with a rain to cover the expenses.

One thing is that the victim bucks the bucks of the bucks, spacks the bucks of the victim, knenee, knekbbbbbs once, and assault the victim.

2. The facts charged in the instant case are crimes falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act.

In that sense, the agreement that the injured party does not want the punishment of the defendant by mutual consent without any condition with the defendant is recognized on March 24, 2016. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.