A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On August 3, 2018, at around 00:35, the Defendant received a report from the victim E (the 26-year old-old) who was a policeman belonging to the D District Unit of the Heungdong Police Station, and the police officer called to the site on August 3, 2018, at around 00:35, the Defendant sold the victim and the police officer to the victim and the cdong of the said apartment zone by getting out of the disturbance to the Defendant, leading the victim and the cdong of the said apartment zone, leading him to her to her, and her talking him to her, and her talked with the victim and the F in order to move into the said apartment apartment zone G, thereby keeping the Defendant from the Defendant. On the other hand, the victim’s chest part of the victim’s chest and the two parts of the two parts of the fridge with the quih of the victim’s wheel and the two parts of the quih hand.

As such, the Defendant assaulted the above police officers to interfere with the legitimate performance of duties by the police officers regarding the handling of 112 reported duties by the police officers, and at the same time, committed the victim's multi-facement of the number of days of treatment and the son's son's knife.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of police statement concerning E and F;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs by reporting internal accidents, or by capturing CCTV images;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstruction of performance of official duties) and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes (Punishment prescribed for the most severe crime of bodily injury);

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. The records and arguments of this case, such as the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc., under unfavorable circumstances such as the fact that the crime of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is recognized and the mistake is seriously against the Defendant, the primary offender is not injured, the fact that the victim police officers deposited money for the purpose of the crime, and the fact that the police officers who performed official duties under the influence of alcohol are in bad conditions and the degree of the type of force that the Defendant exercised, and the fact that the degree of force that the Defendant exercised is not less easily, etc.