The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the sentence of one year and six months sentenced by the court below is too unreasonable.

2. Each of the crimes of this case is determined by taking into account the following facts: (a) the Defendant, by using a fiduciary relationship with the victim as a chain of relationship; (b) deceiving the victim to use trust relationship; (c) deceiving the victim about 78 million won in total; (d) the nature of the crime is very poor in light of the method of the crime; and (e) the case is not easy in light of the frequency of the crime or the degree of damage; (b) although the Defendant fully acknowledges each of the crimes of this case, it is doubtful whether the Defendant is true and not; (c) it is difficult to find materials to recognize that the Defendant has endeavored to recover damage; (d) there is no evidence to recognize that the Defendant has made efforts to recover damage; (e) the record contains 10 times or more, including the punishment or suspended execution of the same crime; and (e) the same crime includes a majority of the crimes of this case, which have been committed by deceiving the female in a similar relationship with each of the crimes of this case, and that each of the repeated crimes of this case is committed during the period of the same kind of crime; (d) the victim’s age and economic difficulty before and after the Defendant’s.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.