The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable, for six months of imprisonment imposed by the defendant.

2. It is recognized that the judgment of the defendant is against the defendant's recognition of all of the crimes of this case, and that the person who will support the elderly's will no longer have been the defendant since the birth was at hand, and that each of the crimes of this case is concurrent crimes under the latter part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act with the crime of acquiring stolen goods and the crime of acquiring stolen goods as stated in the judgment of the court below for which punishment has become final, and after examining whether to grant reduction or exemption of punishment pursuant to Article 39 (1) of the Criminal Act, the punishment should be determined. The defendant can be less than one year due to the above crime of acquiring stolen goods and each of the crimes of this case, and if released, the defendant will pay a loan to the victimized company within the

However, each of the crimes of this case is to obtain a loan equivalent to 12 million won from the damaged company by submitting the documents necessary for the application for the loan to the financial institution with the knowledge of the fact that the defendant was forged, and to obtain a total of 12 million won from the damaged company, and in light of the criminal law, the nature of the crime is very poor in light of the amount of the fraud, and in particular, the defendant committed each of the crimes of this case without weighting despite the period of repeated crime, and did not agree with the damaged company. In light of records, there is no evidence to prove that the defendant made efforts to recover damage, there is no history of criminal punishment, including the same crime, and there is other records to prove that the defendant made efforts to recover damage, and there are other records, such as the defendant's age, environment, occupation, family relationship, circumstances leading to each of the crimes of this case, and various circumstances that form the conditions for sentencing as shown in the records before and after the crime.