The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentencing of the lower court (one year of imprisonment and additional collection) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below is against the defendant's depth while making a confession of all of the crimes of this case, the fact that the defendant had no record of punishment for the same kind before, etc. However, the crime of this case is committed in favor of the defendant, but the defendant received and administered phiphonephones, administered marijuana, and smoked marijuana over two times, and there is no such record that the defendant had been subject to juvenile disposition and criminal punishment several times including three times of suspended execution. In particular, the defendant committed the crimes of Articles 3 and 4 of the crime of this case as stated in the judgment of the court below since he was investigated by an investigative agency due to the crimes of Articles 1 and 2 of the crime of this case as stated in the judgment of the court below, and it is deemed that the court below determined the punishment by considering the circumstances favorable to the defendant in light of the sentencing of the same kind of crime of this case, and considering the motive and circumstance of each crime of this case, the circumstances after the crime of this case, the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, etc., it is too unreasonable to sentencing.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.