The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal has no fact that the defendant voluntarily administers philophones, or smokes marijuana;

2. The lower court also argued to the effect that the Defendant alleged the above mistake of facts, and the lower court recognized the fact that the Defendant administered a phiphone and smoked marijuana as recorded in the facts charged, in light of the following: (a) from the urine submitted by the Defendant on March 26, 2019, the phiphones and marijuana ingredients were detected in the rophones; (b) the rophones were detected in the rophones seized by the Defendant; and (c) the fact that the Defendant’s assertion on the circumstances in which the rophones were detected in the rophones; and (c) the Defendant’s assertion on the circumstances in which the rophones were detected in the rophones, etc. were difficult to believe.

In light of the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, the judgment of the court below is justified, and the defendant's assertion of mistake is without merit.

3. Therefore, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.