logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2016.02.03 2015고단3932
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, with respect to Defendant B, from the date of the final judgment of this case.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A On January 27, 2015, a District Court of the Republic of Korea sentenced on two years of imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Intermediation of Commercial Sex Acts (the brokerage, etc. of commercial sex acts) and sentenced on two years of suspended sentence for eight months,

2. 4. A final and conclusive decision and currently is in the grace period;

On February 2, 2015, through "C", the Defendants discovered the acquisition of "E", which is a commercial sex business establishment in which the shower room and sediment are installed, in a size of about 210 square meters of the second floor of D D's 2nd floor in Siri-si, and four CCTVs were taken over from the professional state F to operate the commercial sex business establishment together.

Defendant

A around July 29, 2015, around 22:30 on July 29, 2015, arranged commercial sex acts by allowing female employees G to enter the room to receive 120,000 won in cash from male descendants and guide 20,000 won in cash from the said room, and let them enter the same sex relationship.

In addition, Defendant A from February 23, 2015 to the same year

7. The same year from June 25, 2015 to June 29, 201, and Defendant B from June 25, 2015

7. From the day of February 29, Defendant B mainly received 120,000 won and similarity act from male customers, and had female workers employed in advance. Defendant A reside in the above business place and managed cleaning and prompt cleaning and management of the business place, and Defendant B did not observe Defendant B, Defendant A received money from male guests as above from male guests and caused them to have sexual intercourse workers and sexual intercourse workers. The Defendants jointly used profits from the business of the above business place.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to arrange sexual traffic for business purposes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A written statement of H’s G self-written statement;

1. Field control photographs;

1. A copy of lease agreement;

1. The fluoric photo of the victim's cell phone closures;

arrow