Text
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
The first instance court.
Reasons
1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation on this part of the basic facts is that the relevant part of the judgment of the court of first instance is identical to that of the judgment, and thus, they are cited by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act
The quantity on the bill of quantity on the bill of quantity(metric) on the bill of quantity(metric) on the bill of quantity(metric) on the bill of quantity(metric) on the bill of quantity(metric) calculation x H-700 x 300 x 300 x 70 % 906.82 634.82 634.82 51,676 x 390 x 300 x 70 x 70 % 271.352 189.354.94 189.4 1,676 x total quantity(on the spot) x 70% x 80% 1,146.04 802.23802.676 x 380 46.75 6.675 7.75% of each of the 46.678 74% x 765% of the 7075 4.6.76.74.75
46.75 6.75 617,540 LG 617,540 x the total quantity of LG 70% x 70% 2,658.917 on the design drawing of this case. Pursuant to the 187.49.49, 458,744 Slick trial (on-site arrival) x 190 x 200 x 70% x 200 x 20 2,577.60 1,804.321,804.32,305 2,305 2,305 1.5 1.3 1.0 5 1. 2. 2. 3 5 1. 1. 2. 1. 2. 3 5 1. 2. 1. 2. 3 5 1. 2. 1. 1. 2. 5 2. 1,207 1.
In addition, as the construction is delayed again due to the construction of a bypass road and the separation construction of a bypass line according to the result of the two-lane traffic transition consultation, the construction contract is changed from May 3, 201 to December 20, 201, and the construction period is extended by 231 days from May 3, 2011.