(영문) 의정부지방법원 2020.01.16 2019나203188

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 의정부지방법원 2020.01.16 2019나203188

손해배상(기)

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court of the first instance’s explanation concerning the instant case is the same as that of the first instance judgment, except for the following parts written or added, thereby citing it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance, which was used or added, “in execution,” No. 2, No. 15 of the 2nd sentence of the judgment of the court of first instance, “The Fund of D was executed at will, and transferred the Fund of D to its own personal account, Defendant C, who is his/her father, was employed by the chief of the division of the division, and was executed without reporting to the board of directors or the chief of the board of directors on all other matters, such as the determination and payment of

In the second part of the second part of the judgment of the court of first instance, “Defendant B has the obligation to settle under the agreement with the Plaintiff, and the amount to be settled by Defendant B is KRW 79,266,757 as follows.”

The 3rd to 20th of the first instance judgment shall be deleted from the 8th to the 20th of the first instance judgment, and the following shall be followed:

1) According to the evidence Nos. 2-1, 2, and 1 of the evidence No. 2-1, the plaintiff and the defendant Eul set the contract term from January 1, 2010 to December 30, 2013, with respect to the operation of D, they shall have civil and criminal legal responsibility related to the operation of D, such as “the defendant B fully responsible, operated, and repaid all debts incurred from D Council members. When the contract is terminated or terminated by the plaintiff and the defendant B, the defendant B shall settle all claims and obligations arising from the operation of D Council members (hereinafter “the agreement in this case”). After that, the agreement in this case was renewed and the contract period extended from January 1, 2014 to December 30, 2015, the plaintiff and the defendant B continued the operation of D Council members before the operation of D, and the defendant B maintained the operation of D Council members.

참조조문

-민사소송법 제420조

유사 판례

-의정부지방법원 2020.01.16 2019나203188

-의정부지방법원고양지원 2019.02.13 2016가단12932

-창원지방법원 2016.03.31 2015나9411

-서울고등법원 (인천) 2021.04.29 2020나11146

-대구지방법원 2016.06.22 2015나310177