1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The Intervenor joining the Defendant shall bear the costs of the intervention in the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the pertinent part is modified or added as follows. Thus, it is acceptable to accept this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

1) Of the judgment of the first instance, the term “C” was written by both parties to the Defendant joining the Defendant. 2) On October 22, 2013, the first instance court’s first instance judgment, which read “ October 22, 2010,” as “ October 22, 2013.”

3. Part 4 of the judgment of the court of first instance, Part 17 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall include the following:

In addition, considering that the Defendant’s Intervenor B’s assertion that the mother is well gathering and completed the registration of ownership transfer in the name of joint title as to the instant real estate and that the shares in B are not transferred to the Defendant’s Intervenor, and that the Defendant transferred the shares to the Defendant, the title trust assertion in the Defendant and the Intervenor’s Intervenor

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.