logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2015.01.28 2014고단9790
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등상해)
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for one year and six months.

However, the execution of each of the above penalties for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 14, 2014, around 01:05, the Defendants received a claim from G due to the reason that Defendant B’s remarks from the first Emina on the first floor located in Busan East-gu, the first floor Emina to the victim F (the age of 30) against the victim’s “Is to have tobacco ..................” The Defendants followed the victim to the end of G and Si expenses again.

Defendant

A around that time, A took the victim's face one time by drinking the victim's face, and was an empty beer who is a dangerous object, at one time in front of the victim's head, and Defendant B was driving the part of the victim's head at several times by drinking the part of the victim's head.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to carry dangerous goods and carried them with the victim's head that could not be known, thereby causing bodily injury in need of more than 3 to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Investigation report (Attachment, etc. of standing photographs);

1. Application of the police interrogation protocol of F and G to each police interrogation protocol;

1. Articles 3 (1) and 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning facts constituting an offense, Articles 257 (1) and 30 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence;

1. Where the mitigation area (1 year and six months to two years), mitigation area (1 year and six months to six months), penalty exemption (including advanced efforts for recovery of damage), or considerable damage has been restored to the sentencing criteria [Scope of recommendation] for habitual injury, repeated injury, and special injury (Habitual injury, repeated injury, and special injury) for habitual injury;

2. Considerations such as the fact that the sentence was determined by contingent crimes, the fact that the victim agreed with, and all the Defendants were first offenders

arrow