Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.
Of the facts charged in the instant case, the fraud against the victim E is acquitted.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On September 23, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for a crime of fraud in the Gwangju District Court's Netcheon Branch, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on October 1 of the same year, and on February 5, 2014, the same court sentenced two years of imprisonment for a crime of fraud to two years of suspended execution for October, 13 of the same month.
The Defendant, while operating a slaughterhouse from the Namsung-gun F before around 1995, became a bad credit bad and bad credit holder on 2000, and was engaged in real estate development business under the trade name G Co., Ltd. without any special property, but there was no experience in obtaining any benefit from the development of the real estate before.
From the spring spring start in 2007, the Defendant, while promoting a new construction project of urban residential housing and shopping complex building in the land located in the Hacheon-si, the Defendant agreed to appropriate funds for a bank's PF loan, but the implementation was delayed for more than one year, but the implementation was delayed for more than one year. At the time, the Defendant received only the degree of the intent to participate in the project from the land trust in Korea, and the implementation of the new construction project was unclear because the contract was not smooth with the owners of the land scheduled for the above complex center, and the Defendant did not have a position to reduce the subcontracted project even if the new construction project is implemented as an executor.
Nevertheless, on May 14, 2008, the Defendant, through the J, the captain of the victim I, at the early Haman Sck's place, borrowed money from the victim to the victim to lend money to the victim to build a new cultural facility. The borrowed money would be repaid by July 20, 2008, even if the repayment was made immediately after the commencement of the construction and the commencement of the construction, and the borrowed money would be repaid by July 20, 2008. The Defendant received KRW 100 million in cash from the L restaurant located in K on May 14, 2008. On the same day, the Defendant would borrow additional KRW 50 million to the victim, and the Defendant would have extended additional KRW 50,000 to the victim, and the construction was commenced immediately on the same day.