1. The judgment of the first instance, including the Plaintiff’s claim expanded and reduced in the trial, shall be modified as follows:

1. The reasons for the court's explanation of this case are as follows: "30 million won" in Part 7 of Part 2 of the judgment of the court of first instance; "30 million won" in Part 2 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be "20 million won"; and "34 evidence" in Part 11 of the judgment of second instance shall be "34"; and it shall be as stated in the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance, so it shall be quoted as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420

[Plaintiff's assertion that the Central Administrative Appeals Commission's decision to revoke the petition made by the director of the Seoul High Public Prosecutor's Office as the respondent should not be closed until the defendant's tort is proven due to the second investigation order, but it is difficult to accept as it is difficult to justify the prolongedization of the suit without any omission of the hearing on the issue.]

2. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance, including the plaintiff's claim extended and reduced in the trial, shall be modified as above.