logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.09.15 2017고정2011
도로교통법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 300,000 won.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a car BA4.

On March 10, 2017, the Defendant driven the said car without mandatory insurance on March 10, 2017, and proceeded two lanes from the fourth-lane in the south-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Nam-gu, Seoul to the private distance of the old month, which is small from the north-gu office distance.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes regarding mandatory insurance;

1. Relevant Article 46 (2) 2 and the main sentence of Article 8 of the Guarantee of Automobile Damage Compensation Act and the selection of fines concerning facts constituting an offense;

2. Article 70 (1) and Article 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse.

3. The part dismissing the public prosecution under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a car BA4.

On March 10, 2017, the Defendant driven the above car on March 10, 2017, and driven the two-lanes from the four-lanes in front of the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Nam-gu, Incheon, to the shooting distance from the south-gu office distance.

A person engaged in driving motor vehicles has a duty of care to drive motor vehicles safely by accurately operating steering the steering and steering devices.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and caused the problem to the right side of the defendant's car, which was parked at the edge of the road due to the negligence that operated the Gap's own steering gear to the right side of the road.

Accordingly, the Defendant damaged the dump truck owned by the victim E by the above occupational negligence to cover KRW 885,500 for repairing costs, such as the exchange of noise meters.

2. Determination

(a) Applicable provisions: Article 151 of the Road Traffic Act;

(b) Grounds for dismissing a public prosecution: Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (the victim's expression of intention not to punish him/her on August 13, 2017);

(c) Judgment dismissing a public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act;

arrow