A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

1. The defendant is in violation of the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. (referring to a person who operates a commercial sex acts establishment under the trade name of "C" on the lease of 201, 202, 203 and 204, Seo-gu, Gwangju.

The defendant from March 11, 2013 to the same year.

9. Until October, 100, an employer employed female employees such as D, E, and F in the above place, and had them find out the place, received 80,000 won as compensation for sexual traffic from male customers with no knowledge of their names, and made them arrange sexual traffic by allowing them to do the act of similarity.

2. The Defendant has violated the School Health Act from March 11, 2013 to the same year.

9. From around October, 200 to H elementary schools located in Nam-gu in Gwangju metropolitan area, the above school environmental sanitation and cleanup zone “B” operated a commercial sex business establishment providing services that could cause physical contacts between unspecified persons, exposure to their body parts related to sex, sexual conduct, or similar conduct.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning each prosecutor's office concerning D, E, F, and I;

1. Written Statement;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning internal investigation reports (related to the submission of recording materials and investigation reports in charge of the control), internal investigation reports, and whether they fall under school environmental sanitation and cleanup zones;

1. Articles 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc. concerning facts constituting an offense, Articles 19 (2) 1 of the former School Health Act (Amended by Act No. 12131, Dec. 30, 2013); Articles 19 and 6 (1) of the former School Health Act (Amended by Act No. 12131, Dec. 30, 201); and selection of imprisonment with labor

1. Considering that the reason for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act among concurrent offenders committed the instant crime without being aware of the fact that the Defendant had been punished twice for the same type of crime, and that the Defendant committed the instant crime without being aware of it even during the period of probation.