A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant violated the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. (the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc.) was a person who runs a business of arranging sexual traffic in the name of "E" from the Do of Busan and the 3rd floor, and an act of arranging sexual traffic for the business of arranging sexual traffic by installing eight smuggling and shower rooms at each place from March 2, 2014 to March 17, 2014, employing a female F, and having the female do the act of arranging sexual traffic in such a way as to scambling the sexual organ against the male customers by taking scambling the sexual organ against the male customers, and by receiving 6 to 70 thousand won from the male customers.

2. No person who violates the School Health Act shall conduct "business in a school environmental sanitation and cleanup zone "a facility partitioned by a smuggling, sealed space or partitions, etc. or similar facilities", or conduct "business which is likely to be conducted by exposing physical contact, such as suitable dancing, pet, compost, etc., or parts of a sex-related body, or by exposing sex or similar acts."

Nevertheless, the defendant, at the above businesses located in school environmental sanitation and cleanup zone, installed a smuggling as described in the above 1. Paragraph, and had them do the act of similarity.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. F's certificate;

1. The criminal place;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant Articles 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc. concerning facts constituting an offense, Articles 19 (2) and 6 (1) and 19 (1) and (19) of the School Health Act and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the business size is not much significant without the lapse of the business period for the reasons for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act among concurrent crimes. However, considering the fact that the Defendant committed the instant crimes again, even though he/she was punished once the suspension of the execution of imprisonment with labor for the same kind of crime and three times a fine,