(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.01.25 2017고정2518

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.01.25 2017고정2518

사문서위조등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 2015, the Defendant: (a) expressed his mind to prepare a power of representation stating that the Defendant is appointed as a manager of the said commercial building, even though he was not delegated by another sectional owner of the said commercial building, from among the persons who run a private teaching institute in Young-si D shop 304 in Suwon-si, Suwon-si.

A. On August 8, 2015, the Defendant under the title of delegation forgery: “304 heading A shall be the manager; “I shall consent to the other agenda; and submit the power of attorney.”

The “Name” column of “E” in the letter of delegation written as “the body for inspection” was written as “E” and signed voluntarily on the next side of the above name.

For the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a letter of delegation in the name of E, a private document related to rights and obligations.

B. The proxy forgery defendant in G name shall be entitled to consent to 304 No. A as the manager and submit power of attorney at the time and place specified in paragraph 1 of the same Article.

In the proxy form described as “G”, the “name” column of “the portion delegated to the inspection body” was written in the “name” column and signed voluntarily on the next side of the above name.

For the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a letter of delegation in the name of G, a private document on rights and obligations.

2. On May 24, 2016, the Defendant: (a) exercised the investigation document by submitting a package accompanied by a document in preparation for the confirmation of invalidity of the resolution No. 809, 2016 at the request of the public service center of the Suwon District Court in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, the Suwon District Court, as stated in paragraph (1) with a public official in charge of name influence, who is aware of the forgery; and (b) as such, one proxy of the delegation in the name of E and G was duly formed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of the witness H and I;

1. Statement made by the police to J or K;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the accusation and accompanying documents (each delegation, confirmation, and reproduction of identification card).

유사 판례

-대전지방법원 천안지원 2016.08.18 2016고정313

-서울서부지방법원 2017.10.13 2016고단3152

-서울남부지방법원 2017.05.31 2017고단1078

-대구지방법원 2019.03.14 2018고정1462