1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation on this case is as follows: according to the evidence Nos. 8 and 9 of the judgment of the court of first instance, the plaintiff left the Republic of Korea on April 5, 2017, when the lawsuit of this case was pending, and entered the Republic of Korea again on April 18, 2017, and the plaintiff can freely enter the Republic of Korea. In light of the above, even if the plaintiff returned to the Republic of Korea with his own country, the risk of persecution is not high.

The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it is accepted in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.