1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation on this case is as follows: (a) the Plaintiff entered the Republic of Korea on June 12, 200 and repeated departure and re-entry on seven occasions, after entering the Republic of Korea on June 12, 200; and (b) entered the Republic of Korea on September 14, 2016 when the instant lawsuit was pending, and entered the Republic of Korea on September 20, 2016. In light of the fact that the Plaintiff could freely enter the Republic of Korea, the risk of persecution is not high even if the Plaintiff returned to the Republic of Korea.

The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it is accepted in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.