logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 서산지원 2018.05.09 2017고합65
일반건조물방화등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 17, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to ten months of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime of fire prevention of general goods in the Seosan Branch of the Daejeon District Court on December 17, 2015 and completed the execution of the sentence in the Port Prison on August 13, 2016.

Criminal facts

1. Fire prevention of general buildings;

A. On October 15, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 00:50 on October 15, 2017, on the ground that the victim D in Thai-gun, Thai-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun did not open any door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door, which was prepared in advance to boom the end inside the above building and its door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door, the victim D, etc.

Accordingly, the Defendant destroyed the property worth KRW 7 million in total at the market price of the victim D and the victim F, which is the victim F.

B. On November 3, 2017, around 04:10 on November 3, 2017, the Defendant: (a) discovered a paper stuff loaded immediately adjacent to the above container stuff; and (b) attached a fire with one-time tool prepared in advance without any reason under the influence of alcohol to the entire stuff of the instant container.

Accordingly, the Defendant destroyed the property worth KRW 2 million at the market price owned by the victim.

2. On November 3, 2017, at around 00:30, the Defendant: (a) discovered a ice stuff owned by the Victim K, which was loaded in the front J of the Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-do; and (b) attached a fire to one-time gate prepared in advance without any reason under the influence of alcohol, and had the fluor 30 mal length of the fluor, which was fluent.

Accordingly, the defendant caused public danger by burning the unclaimed property in the aggregate market value owned by the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to I and K;

1. Written statements of D;

1.Each.

arrow