logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2020.07.23 2020고정981
절도
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 300,000.

However, it is against the Defendants for one year from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 3, 2019, Defendant A stolen electricity equivalent to KRW 15,00 at a market price on five occasions in total, as shown in the annexed Table 1, from December 3, 2019 to February 13, 2020, by linking emergency shock power to the contact installed in the Contact column of the said DF, managed by the victim E (n.e., age 45) and charging electricity to the electric vehicle owned by the Defendant for about 10 hours (c. 3,000 won at a market price).

2. Defendant B stolen electricity equivalent to KRW 24,00 at a total of eight times from December 3, 2019 to February 23, 2020, such as charging electricity to HO clinic electric vehicles owned by the Defendant, in the same manner as in the foregoing paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Photographs of the front page of the case, and the criminal photograph of the suspect;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the enemy inquiry (B) and the next enemy inquiry (A);

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act and the Defendants’ choice of punishment regarding criminal facts: The Defendants shall be punished by a fine under each Article of the Criminal Act.

1. Defendants among concurrent crimes: former part of Article 37, Articles 38(1)2 and 50 of the Criminal Act

1. The Defendants on probation: Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act provides that the Defendants are aware of all the facts charged of this case and reflect their mistakes in depth, the amount of damage of this case is minor, and the Defendants are dismissed at the workplace accompanying the commission of the crime of this case, and there is no record of criminal punishment and there is no record of criminal punishment against the Defendants A (Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is still pending trial

(2) Defendant B’s Defendant B’s primary crime without any previous criminal record, etc.

1. Defendants of detention in a workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act

arrow