Text
1. On September 19, 2014, the Defendant issued a disposition not to approve the Plaintiff’s additional medical care for official duties and extension of the period.
Reasons
1. Details of the disposition;
A. On October 9, 1989, while serving as a fire fighter, the Plaintiff was diagnosed as “porizontal escape at the end of the end of the year No. 4-5” due to an accident that falls on the ground, while working as a fire fighter, and obtained approval for medical care for official duties, and received invertecule in the Youngdong Synae Hospital by the time of the accident, and received hospital treatment by December 30, 1989, and by June 30, 1990.
B. On July 25, 2014, the Plaintiff claimed that the instant injury or disease was caused by a war-approval injury after undergoing a diagnosis of vertebrate vertecule Nos. 3-4 and 4-5 in the verteculum (the instant injury or disease below), and filed an application for additional injury or disease with the Defendant from December 10 to December 11, 2013, and filed an application for extension of the period of medical care for the period from December 18, 2013 to February 12, 2014.
C. On September 19, 2014, the Defendant rendered a disposition that no approval for the extension of the period of medical care for official duties and injury was granted on the ground that: (a) the instant wound was pressured in the vertebro, wherein the invertero was narrow and the bridged to the bridge; and (b) it is difficult to deem that the climatic disease was directly and mainly caused by the climatic and paralysis; and (c) it is difficult to deem that the climatic disease was directly and mainly caused by the climatic disease (the instant disposition was taken below).
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1, 3, 4, and 5, purport of the whole pleadings
2. Determination on the legitimacy of the disposition
A. The plaintiff asserted that the plaintiff had been operated to remove a conical signboard with an escape certificate No. 4-5, which was caused by the crash accident that occurred on October 9, 1989. The plaintiff continued to return to the workplace without sufficient rest after the operation and returned to the workplace for fire extinguishment and rescue activities. The plaintiff's duties are mostly those imposing excessive burden on the lusium, and the disease of this case was caused by official duties. However, the disease of this case was caused by the disease of this case, and is based on the previous approved soldier's disease and official duties.