1. On May 14, 2015, the Defendant’s non-approval disposition of additional injury and injury to medical care for official duties and extension of the period against the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On December 18, 1987, the Plaintiff, a police officer, was diagnosed as an accident that knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee in the direction of the Defendant. On June 27, 196, the Plaintiff obtained an additional medical treatment approval from the Defendant, and obtained approval for medical treatment by September 4, 197, the Plaintiff applied for approval for the extension of the medical treatment period and the Defendant.

B. On May 14, 2015, the Defendant rendered a disposition of non-approval of the additional medical care and extension of the period for official duties (the instant disposition in the following cases) on the ground that the instant injury and disease occurred more than 27 years after credit, and the injury and disease caused by the direct and principal cause of the injury and disease, and that it appears that the injury and disease occurred due to the change in the ex post facto evacuation of the official duties.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 4, purport of whole pleadings

2. Determination on the legitimacy of the disposition

A. The plaintiff's assertion was caused by the disaster of this case by the five-month string of the left-hand slots and caused by the disaster of this case, and the plaintiff received the "presivesivesivesivesivesivesivesivesivesives and activesivesivesivesivesivesivessivesivesivesivesivesives and activessivesivessivessivessive on August 14, 1997" on August 14, 1997. However, if the strings are damaged by the strings, the situation that the strings’s level per se increases the frequency of the strings’ occurrence, and that the strings’ level is weakened due to the string damage, also increases the risk of the strings’ outbreak. In the case of the plaintiff, the situation appears to be the same as that of the strings damage caused by the strings’ damage.