logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2017.08.17 2014구합1229
국가유공자등록거부처분취소
Text

1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On January 29, 2003, the Plaintiff was discharged from active service on February 21, 2005 by entering as an auxiliary police officer.

B. The plaintiff asserted that "two appointed soldiers, each of whom were transferred to the headquarters of the Seoul Local Police Agency No. 4 Dongdong District Police Agency, were on the part of the plaintiff's head at least 20 times after examining the plaintiff's buckbbbbbbbbs' hand, and that the plaintiff complained of the plaintiff's pain, but the plaintiff appealed to do so. The plaintiff did so on the part of the plaintiff's head. The plaintiff cut off the stairs belonging to the next day and her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her she was off by the emergency vehicle inside the military unit." However, the plaintiff's her she was hospitalized to the National Police Hospital on May 20, 2013.

C. On November 19, 2013, following deliberation by the Board of Patriots and Veterans Entitlement, the Defendant rendered a non-specific decision on the requirements for persons who have rendered distinguished services to the State and persons eligible for veteran’s compensation (hereinafter “instant original disposition”) on the grounds that it is difficult to recognize that the instant wounds were caused as having been suffering from acute injury due to performance of duties or during education and training directly related to national defense, security, etc., or that they were suffering from duties or during education and training directly related to national defense, security, etc.

On December 23, 2013, the Plaintiff filed an objection against the Defendant. However, the Defendant, following a review by the Board of Patriots and Veterans Entitlement, rendered a decision on February 10, 2014 on the non-conformity of the requirements for a person who rendered distinguished service to the State and a person eligible for veteran’s compensation.”

arrow