1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On April 21, 1967, the Plaintiff was Birs and was discharged from military service with the maturity of May 16, 1970. During the military service period, the Plaintiff was Vietnam Wared from February 5, 1969 to April 12, 1970.

B. On May 15, 2008, the Plaintiff filed an application for registration with the Defendant for distinguished service to the State on the ground of bad faith. On September 24, 2008, after deliberation and resolution of the Board of Patriots and Veterans Entitlement, on October 2, 2008, the Defendant rendered a disposition that fell under the requirements of a person who rendered distinguished service to the State against the Plaintiff.

The plaintiff filed an administrative appeal on October 2, 2008 against the defendant's non-conforming disposition of merit, and the administrative appeals commission under the Prime Minister dismissed the plaintiff's claim on March 17, 2009.

C. On September 30, 2013, the Plaintiff filed an application for registration of a person who rendered distinguished services to the State on the ground of his/her subordinate injury to the Defendant again.

Accordingly, on January 17, 2014, following the deliberation and resolution of the Board of Patriots and Veterans Entitlement on December 23, 2013, the Defendant issued against the Plaintiff a disposition non-conforming to the requirements for persons who have rendered distinguished services to the State and persons eligible for veteran’s compensation (hereinafter “the disposition of refusal of registration of the persons rendering distinguished services to the State of this case”), on the ground that “it is not verified that the relevant injury was clearly affected by the performance of duties or education and training directly related to national defense, security of the State, or the protection of the lives and property of the people, and there is no evidence to prove that there is a proximate causal link with the performance of duties or education and training not directly related to national defense, security, etc., and that there is no evidence to prove that there is a sudden aggravation of the aforementioned duty or education and training at a speed beyond the natural progress level.”

【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there has been no dispute, Gap Nos. 1, 3, Eul No. 1, 2, 6, and 8, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The plaintiff's summary of the plaintiff's assertion is Vietnam War.