logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원강릉지원 2019.04.16 2018가합30637
손해배상(기)
Text

1. Defendant C: (a) KRW 3,000,000 to Plaintiff A; and (b) Defendant D to the Plaintiffs respectively, KRW 3,000,000; and (c) each of the above amounts.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The relation 1) The plaintiffs and the defendants are those engaged in each driving school business in Gangseo-si, and they are the E Federation (hereinafter "Federation").

(2) Plaintiff B served as the president of the Federation in around 2004, and Plaintiff A served as a financial director of the Federation in around 2004.

3) Defendant C performed the duties of the president of the Federation on November 2015, and Plaintiff A went out to the next election for the president at that time. (b) Defendant C, the president of the Federation of defamations against Plaintiff C, who was the president of the Federation of defamations against Plaintiff C, on November 1, 2015, talked about the next election for the president at the restaurant where Ha is a member of the Federation, H and I, who is a member of the Federation, at the Seocho-si F, Seocho-si on November 2015, and “Plaintiff A is a non- moral person who is a financial director at the time of Plaintiff B’s holding office around 2004, and is one who is personally useful for the public funds of the Federation.” (hereinafter “instant defamations 1”).

2) However, Plaintiff A did not personally use KRW 1,194,00,00,00 from the 2004 presidential conference. On December 14, 2007, Plaintiff A reported that there was no problem that Plaintiff A did not use the said public funds individually. Defendant C attended the meeting of the advisory group as the vice-chairperson of the said advisory group and was aware of the same contents. C) Plaintiff C, on September 30, 2016, had the suspicions as to the issues that occurred at the time when Defendant C was in charge of a director of the federation’s financial office for the 10th year prior to the 2004 presidential conference, and Defendant C was aware of the same contents. Plaintiff C, on September 30, 2016, was able to spread continuous false facts to members of the federation so far, and she suffered considerable mental damage due to serious defamation.

Since it is no longer implied, it is intended to bring a criminal charge against false information or defamation.

direct prejudice; and

arrow