logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2016.04.01 2015고정1041 (1)
자동차관리법위반
Text

The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

C, D, E, and 16 other persons were working as the head of each team at the above office, and from the beginning of July 2014 to February 12, 2015, they did not register a motor vehicle trading business with the head of the Si/Gun/Gu in the office without a trade name located on the f1st floor in Bupyeong-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City. D sold approximately 40 vehicles to private customers during the above period by using computers installed in the above office, etc., and C, with the knowledge of the fact that each of the above offices was working as the head of the team, Defendant and M, N,O, P, Q, Q, S, T, U, and V, with the knowledge of the fact that each of the above offices was operated by the Defendant in the name of the customer with the above office.

Accordingly, the Defendant conspiredd with C, etc. to conduct a unregistered automobile trading business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The legal statement of the witness H in part;

1. Statement made by the police against X;

1. The Defendant did not know whether the automobile trading business was conducted with the registration without registration of the “H Team” to which he/she belongs, while working as a “W” employee, who is a registered automobile dealer.

The argument is asserted.

However, according to the witness H’s partial statement, the Defendant entered into a used car sales contract in the name of “W”, and during that process, the Defendant’s business registration certificate was presented several times, the address of “W” recorded in the above business registration certificate and the place where the Defendant actually worked is not in accord with the place where the Defendant actually worked. When concluding a contract with a customer, the Defendant can recognize the fact that the Defendant entered into a contract with “W” office instead of the office that he/she worked. As such,

arrow