logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
red_flag_2
(영문) 부산지방법원 2015. 5. 15. 선고 2015노770 판결
[도로교통법위반(음주운전)·도로교통법위반(무면허운전)·자동차손해배상보장법위반·상해][미간행]
Escopics

Defendant

Appellant. An appellant

Defendant

Prosecutor

Park Jae-young (prosecution) and cryp (public trial)

Defense Counsel

Attorney Kim private-young

Judgment of the lower court

Busan District Court Decision 2014Da3162, 6379 (Consolidated) Decided January 28, 2015

Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

The sentence of one-year imprisonment sentenced by the court below against the defendant is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

It is recognized that the defendant recognized each of the crimes in this case and reflected his mistake, and that the defendant worked in △△△△△△ Office of ○○-gu as a self-support worker before being detained.

However, the crime of this case was committed on January 4, 2013 when the defendant was sentenced to 10 months prior to the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Aggravated Punishment, etc. on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes) and was sentenced to 10 months prior to the enforcement of the sentence, and was committed on two occasions during the repeated period where 6 months have not passed since the enforcement of the sentence was terminated, and the crime was committed without a license or drinking driving, and the victim who is a security officer of the hospital without any reason, and the nature of the crime is not weak. In particular, the defendant repeated the crime of the same kind of crime even though there were many records of punishment prior to the drunk driving (in particular, even though the crime was committed as a drunk driving, the crime of drinking driving was committed without being able to cause harm to the life and body of others, and the amended Road Traffic Act strengthens the punishment of the victim and the victim related to the crime of injury, the defendant's age agreed with the victim, the circumstances and circumstances leading to the crime of this case, etc.

3. Conclusion

Therefore, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.

Judges Kim Jong-hee (Presiding Judge)

arrow