beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant, who was operating D in Siri-si, was introduced to F through E in which the Defendant and the above Ka Center were trying to run the business, and came to know of F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. a criminal act of assaulting the Defendant’s home located near the above Ka Center, was tried to appear in the court according to the application of the witness of the prosecution.
On February 27, 2014, at the court of Incheon District Court No. 410, the Defendant appeared and taken an oath as a witness of the above case against F, such as the violation of the Act on the Punishment of Sexual Crimes and the Protection of Victims (Rape in Relatives) with respect to F, etc., and testified as follows: “When the witness operates D, he testified as “I do not have any question of the public prosecutor’s “I have any enemy and his family members at the time of the operation of D, what he or she had been in the Kk Center,” and testified as “I have no record of the Defendant’s family members having been in the Kk Center,” and testified as “I have no record of the Defendant’s family members.”
However, there was a fact in the defendant's car center that the defendant considered F's sheshel's shel's sheshes from the above F.
Nevertheless, the Defendant made a false statement contrary to memory as above and raised perjury.
Summary of Evidence
1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of one copy of the protocol of examination of witness (part of the sixth protocol of trial), stenographic records of examination of witness (G, A, H, F), and a copy of the judgment of the first instance related to height647;
1. Relevant Article 152 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;
1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;
1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act provides that the accused's perjury does not have any particular influence on the trial of the relevant case, and the accused is sentenced to a fine of not only the same criminal power but also the previous two times.