logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.04.27 2015누57835
유족급여및장의비부지급처분취소
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the first instance judgment citing the Defendant’s appeal is not significantly different from the content of the Defendant’s assertion in the first instance trial, and the evidence submitted in the first instance trial citing the entire purport of the argument, in full view of the overall purport of the arguments, the deceased’s symptoms occur due to extreme occupational stress and mental pain immediately before suicide, and the deceased’s normal perception, ability to choose action, and ability to restrain mental disorder gets worse, and the judgment of the first instance court admitting that proximate causal relation between the deceased’s work and death can be acknowledged as legitimate, and the evidence submitted in the first instance trial admitting that the causal relation between the deceased’s work and the death can be acknowledged as being caused by suicide in such a state. The evidence submitted in the first instance trial

Therefore, this court's reasoning is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, this court's reasoning is accepted in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is just and the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is so dismissed as per Disposition.

arrow