1. Revocation of a judgment of the first instance;

2. On February 4, 2016, the Defendant’s disposition of bereaved family benefits and funeral site pay to the Plaintiff.

1. The grounds for the judgment of this court partially citing the judgment of the court of first instance are as follows: “The developments leading to the disposition of this case” and “the lawfulness of the disposition of this case

A. The plaintiff's assertion;

(b) the relevant legislation;

C. The facts of recognition are as follows: (i) content of the deceased’s work and working hours; (ii) content of documents such as books prepared by the deceased; (iii) the results of the Cheongnam-do’s on-site investigation related to the death of the deceased; and (iv) medical opinions, up to the date of the first instance judgment, the pertinent part of the reasoning of the first instance judgment (from No. 4 to No. 11 and No. 15 to No. 16). As such, it shall be cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act; and (iii) main text

2. 【On-the-job accident” under Article 37(1) of the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act refers to the injury, disease, physical disability, or death of an employee caused by his/her occupational accident while performing his/her duties. Thus, there should be causation between the occupational accident and the disaster.

The causal relationship is proved by the assertion, but it is not necessarily required to be proved by medical or natural science, and if the proximate causal relationship is recognized from the normative point of view, there is such proof.

Therefore, in the event that a worker’s severe occupational stress and mental suffering has aggravated depression, and where it is possible to see that his/her normal perception, ability to choose an act, and mental suppression are considerably deteriorated and that his/her reasonable judgment could not be expected, a proximate causal relation may be found between the deceased’s work and death. In the process, the personal vulnerability, such as the resistant nature of the deceased, has influenced the resolution of suicide.

There is no difference in the fact that the symptoms of mental illness, such as cryptism, loss, or over-injury, immediately before the suicide, do not change.

Supreme Court Decision 201.44