logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2016.07.12 2016가단3289
사해행위취소에 의한 가액배상금
Text

1. The inherited property concluded on October 14, 2014 between the defendant and the non-party B regarding the real estate stated in the separate sheet.

Reasons

1. Indication of claims: It shall be as shown in attached Form; and

2. Judgment without holding any pleadings (Articles 208 (3) 1 and 257 of the Civil Procedure Act);

3. The obligation to pay compensation for the value due to the revocation of a part of dismissal occurs only when the formation of the judgment of revocation of a fraudulent act, which is the premise thereof, becomes final and conclusive, and there is no delay liability until the judgment becomes final and conclusive, and thus no damages for delay shall be acknowledged. The plaintiff claims damages for delay from the date of the final and conclusive judgment, but it is recognized from the date following the date of final

arrow