logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2017.02.08 2016가단50318
사해행위취소
Text

1. Inherited property concluded on October 24, 2012 between the defendant and the non-party B regarding the real estate stated in the separate sheet.

Reasons

1. The description of the grounds for the claim shall be as specified in the attached Form;

2. Article 208 (3) 1 of the Civil Procedure Act of the applicable provisions of Acts (a judgment by non-drawing);

3. The Plaintiff’s dismissal portion claimed damages for delay from the day immediately following the date of this judgment, but the obligation to pay compensation for the value arising from the revocation of a fraudulent act occurs only when the formation judgment becomes final and conclusive, which serves as the premise, and thus, it cannot be held liable for delay before the judgment becomes final and conclusive. Therefore, the Plaintiff’s claim for damages for delay exceeding the above recognition scope is without merit.

arrow